Année : 2024

National News and Press Releases. Local and Regional Perspectives. Media Advisories.

News in Focus. Corporate Analytics. Brand Reviews. Policy Commentaries.
I have heard some talk recently about a Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) company and I wanted to examine it further. It’s possible that you were contacted through the internet regarding the company’s health supplements or compensation plan, which led you here to determine if it’s a legitimate opportunity.
I will guide you through all the details about the company, its products, and its compensation plan so that you can make an informed choice about whether or not to join. It’s important that you read this carefully and pay close attention till the end.
What is LiveGood Review?
LiveGood Review is a network marketing company focused on promoting health through the use of supplements.
Their aim is to make it possible for people to maintain good health without breaking the bank. The reason for this noble mission is due to the fact that many Americans are not getting all the necessary vitamins and minerals from their diets, which can lead to various health issues.
By taking supplements, one can ensure that their body has all the necessary nutrients to perform optimally and improve overall health, including boosting immunity and aiding digestion. In reality, the majority of Americans, about 92%, are lacking in one or more vital vitamins or minerals.
Who is Ben Glinsky Review?
Ben Glinsky is the head of LiveGood and has prior experience in the industry. He was responsible for growing a successful company called Skinny Body Care, which was eventually acquired by Valentus. From analyzing his content and personal description, it appears that he has a genuine desire to assist others, which is commendable.
Leadership Team in Live Good MLM
The key to a successful network marketing company is having a strong team behind the CEO. In the case of LiveGood, the CEO has the support of:
Based on a review of their backgrounds, each of these individuals has a track record of success in the industry.
What Are LiveGood Products?
When examining the products offered by LiveGood, I was pleasantly surprised by how competitive their prices are compared to the general market.
It’s typical for network marketing companies to charge higher prices for their products in order to compensate their distributors through multi-level compensation plans.
However, LiveGood offers a range of products at reasonable prices, including Bio-Active Complete Multi-Vitamins for Men and Women, D3-K2, Ultra Magnesium Complex, Complete Plant-Based Protein, and Organic Super Greens, all of which are manufactured in the USA.
The prices are attractive and the serving sizes and doses are appropriate, making these products a good value. The profit margins are also reasonable given that they are physical products. The speaker notes that they have a personal interest in fitness and regularly spend hundreds of dollars on supplements each month. A full list of products is available on LiveGood’s website.
Upon further examination of the products offered by LiveGood, the products seem to be legitimate, with appropriate serving sizes and doses, and are reasonably priced. Additionally, they are manufactured in the USA.
The profit margins are acceptable, especially given that they are physical products. The author mentions that they have a personal interest in fitness and regularly spend hundreds of dollars on supplements each month, which gives them a good understanding of the market.
How To Make Money With LiveGood Reviews?
LiveGood provides two ways to earn income through their products and opportunities. The first option is to sell the products directly to retail customers. The second is to recruit new individuals into the company and earn commissions from the products they sell to retail customers.
LiveGood Compensation Plan Explained
LiveGood rewards you for selling to retail customers by paying you the difference between the retail and wholesale prices, as well as for bringing in new members to the company who also sell to retail customers. The company utilizes a multi-tier unilevel compensation plan that includes various performance bonuses. There is a video produced by an affiliate that provides a clear explanation of the compensation plan, but it should be noted that the video is promotional in nature.

Cost To Join LiveGood MLM Review?
Joining LiveGood as an affiliate requires a monthly fee of $49.95 for the first month and a reduced fee of $9.95 for subsequent months. Additionally, purchasing products from LiveGood will incur additional costs.
Final judgment – Is LiveGood a scam?
In conclusion, is LiveGood a scam? Based on the facts and information available, it appears that the company is legitimate. The leadership team has experience in the industry, the products are high-quality and competitively priced, and the compensation plan focuses on retail sales. The best way to determine if LiveGood is right for you is to try their products and make a decision based on personal experience. If you are already part of LiveGood or considering joining, the ultimate goal is to grow your business and achieve success.
Join me as a member of LiveGood. I, Eugene Miller, am an independent affiliate marketer and I would be delighted to have you as a part of my team. Use my referral link to sign up.

source

source

A bitcoin (BTC) slump spiraled into over $700 million worth of liquidations across futures tracking major tokens, with XRP and dogecoin (DOGE) products recording unusually high losses.
BTC fell under $100,000 in late U.S. hours before slightly recovering during early Asian hours Thursday, as the Federal Reserve hinted at a few rate cuts in 2025. Fed chair Jerome Powell then said at a post-FOMC press conference that the central bank wasn’t allowed to own bitcoin under current regulations — in response to a question about President-elect Donald Trump’s strategic reserve promises.
"That's the kind of thing that Congress should consider, but we are not looking for a law change," Powell said. In a July campaign, Trump said the government would keep 100% of all the bitcoin it currently holds or acquires in the future under his administration — referring to the stockpile of seized BTC held by the country.
BTC fell 3% after Powell’s comments, causing a dive across majors. XRP, dogecoin (DOGE) and Solana’s SOL fell as much as 5.5%, with BNB Chain’s BNB and ether (ETH) down 2.5%. Chainlink’s LINK fared the worst with a 10% drop — erasing some gains from earlier in the week as Trump-backed World Liberty Financial purchased $2 million worth of the tokens.
The market slide led to over $700 million in bullish bets liquidated, with futures tracking smaller altcoins and meme tokens recording higher losses than BTC or ETH futures in an unusual move, data shows.
A liquidation occurs when an exchange forcefully closes a trader's leveraged position due to the trader's inability to meet the margin requirements. Large-scale liquidations can indicate market extremes, like panic selling or buying.
A cascade of liquidations might suggest a market turning point, where a price reversal could be imminent due to an overreaction in market sentiment.
Some traders say Powell’s comment may mark a local top, dampening expectations of a continued rally toward the end of the month.
“Crypto markets may have entered a peak if a U.S. Bitcoin strategic reserve is no longer in play, as this promise helped to fuel the recent months' rally to new all-time highs, Nick Ruck, director at LVRG Research, shared with CoinDesk in a Telegram message. “Although an interest rate cut would normally have a bullish reaction since it was largely expected, the market strongly reacted after Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated that inflation would be a continuing problem throughout the next year.”
Traders at Singapore-based QCP Capital, however, remain generally bullish for the coming year.
“Don't get shaken out of your positions if a drop occurs. With 2025 poised to be a potentially bullish year for crypto, particularly with Trump in office, staying the course may prove beneficial,” the company said in a Thursday broadcast message.
Shaurya is the Co-Leader of the CoinDesk tokens and data team in Asia with a focus on crypto derivatives, DeFi, market microstructure, and protocol analysis. Shaurya holds over $1,000 in BTC, ETH, SOL, AVAX, SUSHI, CRV, NEAR, YFI, YFII, SHIB, DOGE, USDT, USDC, BNB, MANA, MLN, LINK, XMR, ALGO, VET, CAKE, AAVE, COMP, ROOK, TRX, SNX, RUNE, FTM, ZIL, KSM, ENJ, CKB, JOE, GHST, PERP, BTRFLY, OHM, BANANA, ROME, BURGER, SPIRIT, and ORCA. He provides over $1,000 to liquidity pools on Compound, Curve, SushiSwap, PancakeSwap, BurgerSwap, Orca, AnySwap, SpiritSwap, Rook Protocol, Yearn Finance, Synthetix, Harvest, Redacted Cartel, OlympusDAO, Rome, Trader Joe, and SUN.
ABOUT
CONTACT
POLICIES

source

MyNewsLA.com
Breaking news for Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside counties
No tickets matching all six numbers were sold for Wednesday evening’s drawing of the multi-state Powerball lottery, pushing the estimated jackpot for Saturday’s drawing to $88 million.
A ticket with five numbers, but missing the Powerball number, was sold in Sacramento and is worth $1,391,550, according to the California Lottery.
Sign up here for our free newsletters. We’ll send you the latest headlines every morning and every weekday afternoon.

MyNewsLA.com won’t sell your information and you can unsubscribe at any time.
The numbers drawn Wednesday were 6, 15, 18, 33, 49 and the Powerball number was 7. Wednesday’s jackpot was $69 million. It was the fifth drawing since the last time a ticket with all six numbers was sold.
The odds of matching all five numbers and the Powerball number is 1 in 292.2 million, according to the Multi-State Lottery Association. The overall chance of winning a prize is 1 in 24.9.
The Powerball game is played in 45 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.


Δ
Sign up here for our free newsletters. We’ll send you the latest headlines every morning and every weekday afternoon.

Check for a confirmation email, and then you’re all set with MyNewsLA.com!

source

WPXI Now

BEAVER FALLS, Pa. — A person was taken to the hospital after a shooting in Beaver Falls Wednesday night.
Beaver County dispatchers said police and EMS units were called to the 300 block of 13th Street at 9:45 p.m. for a shooting.
A male patient was taken to the hospital from the scene. There is currently no word on his condition.
Beaver Falls police are handling the investigation, dispatchers said.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.
Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
©2024 Cox Media Group
© 2024 Cox Media Group. This station is part of Cox Media Group Television. Learn about careers at Cox Media Group. By using this website, you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement and Privacy Policy, and understand your options regarding Ad Choices.

source

5 movies like ‘Carry-On’ to stream right now  Tom’s Guide
source

Sections
About
Connect With Us

WVUA23 News Reporter Callie Cassady
According to our news partner, ABC 3340, multiple Fayette County sheriff’s office vehicles are near the property of a family at the center of missing toddler Kahleb Collins in Fayette County.
The home is located on Highway 129, just outside of Winfield.
Deputies could be seen stretching crime scene tape around the area just before 8:00 p.m. Wednesday.
Some people were also seen on the property with shovels in hand.
His grandfather, John Elton bailey, is being held on a $100,000 bond for failing to report a missing child.
While the complaint against Bailey does not name Kahleb, it reports Bailey did not report a child missing and had a duty to do so.
Authorities first learned Kahleb was missing after his family was in a deadly car crash on December 8th, that killed the father and a two-year-old sibling.
Kahleb’s mother remains in the ICU at UAB hospital in Birmingham.
{jp}

WVUA 23 engages consumers on multiple platforms with relevant and essential news, weather, sports and entertainment content for the communities of West Alabama, the Birmingham DMA and the larger University of Alabama community. We provide students with hands-on learning experiences in an environment that encourages the highest ethical journalistic standards.  
WVUA 23 is a commercial television station owned and operated by the University of Alabama’s College of Communication and Information Sciences.
© 2024 WVUA 23.

source

Hit your long-term targets.
Earn up to 16% per year on digital assets.
Share this article
Sign in to your account
Don’t have an account? Create one
Create your account
Already have an account? Sign In
Forgot your password?
Sign In

source

Zeta Global Holdings Corp. Class Action: Levi & Korsinsky Reminds Zeta Global Holdings Corp. Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit with a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of January 21, 2025 – ZETA  AccessWire
source

After more than four years of litigation, a closely watched copyright case over the Internet Archive’s scanning and lending of library books is finally over after Internet Archive officials decided against exercising their last option, an appeal to the Supreme Court. The deadline to file an appeal was December 3.
With a consent judgment already entered to settle claims in the case, the official end of the litigation now triggers an undisclosed monetary payment to the plaintiff publishers, which, according to the Association of American Publishers, will “substantially” cover the publishers’ attorney fees and costs in the litigation.
“While we are deeply disappointed with the Second Circuit’s opinion in Hachette v. Internet Archive, the Internet Archive has decided not to pursue Supreme Court review,” reads a December 4 statement posted on the Internet Archive’s blog. “We will continue to honor the Association of American Publishers (AAP) agreement to remove books from lending at their member publishers’ requests.” The post added that the IA would continue work with supporters “to advocate for a future where libraries can purchase, own, lend, and preserve digital books.”
The end of the case comes after a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court in September delivered a swift and unequivocal decision that unanimously affirmed judge John G. Koeltl’s March 24, 2023, summary judgment ruling, which found the Internet Archive's program to scan and lend print library books to be copyright infringement.
“This appeal presents the following question: Is it ‘fair use’ for a nonprofit organization to scan copyright-protected print books in their entirety, and distribute those digital copies online, in full, for free, subject to a one-to-one owned-to-loaned ratio between its print copies and the digital copies it makes available at any given time, all without authorization from the copyright-holding publishers or authors? Applying the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act as well as binding Supreme Court and Second Circuit precedent, we conclude the answer is no,” the 64-page decision reads.
The infringement lawsuit was first filed on June 1, 2020, in the Southern District of New York by Hachette, HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, and Wiley, and organized by the AAP. The suit specifically involved 127 works from the plaintiff publishers—a sample of the more than 33,000 plaintiff publishers' works said to be included in the Internet Archive's library—with initial court filings suggesting that the lA's collection included more than a total of 3.6 million works potentially under copyright.
Publisher and author groups had long been troubled by the IA's program and the concept of controlled digital lending. But a lawsuit did not appear imminent until March 2020, when the Internet Archive rattled publishers and authors by unilaterally launching its now shuttered National Emergency Library initiative, which temporarily removed restrictions on the IA's collection in response to the pandemic closures of schools and libraries.
In a statement, AAP reps celebrated what they characterized as a complete legal victory.
“After five years of litigation, we are thrilled to see this important case rest with the decisive opinion of the Second Circuit, which leaves no room for arguments that ‘controlled digital lending’ is anything more than infringement, whether performed by commercial or noncommercial actors, or aimed at authorship that is creative or factual in nature,” said AAP president and CEO Maria Pallante, in a statement. “As the Court recognized, the public interest—and the progress of art and science that is the mandate of the Constitution’s copyright clause—is served best when authors and their publisher licensees can decide the terms on which they make their works available.”
Meanwhile, the Internet Archive’s legal battles are not quite over. The IA is facing a similar, follow-on suit filed by a group of major record labels over its “Great 78” program, which collects vintage 20th century 78 RPM recordings, digitizes them, and makes them freely available to the public.
An archive of PW's coverage of the case is here.
Loading…
Password

Log In Forgot Password

New to PW? To set up immediate access, click here.
NOTE: If you had a previous PW subscription, click here to reactivate your immediate access. PW site license members have access to PW’s subscriber-only website content. If working at an office location and you are not “logged in”, simply close and relaunch your preferred browser. For off-site access, click here. To find out more about PW’s site license subscription options, please email Mike Popalardo at: mike@nextstepsmarketing.com.
If you have questions, contact:
Email: PublishersWeekly@omeda.com
Call:1-800 -278-2991 (outside US/Canada, call +1-847-513-6135) 8:00 am – 4:30 pm, Monday-Friday (Central)

source