Again, 0ne of my favorite scholars on this topic is the Rev. Dr. Kelly Brown Douglas. She is an African-American Episcopal priest, womanist theologian, former interim president of Episcopal Divinity School, and the Canon Theologian at the Washington National Cathedral. In her book Stand Your Ground: Black Bodies and the Justice of God, Douglas lays out a convincing line of reasoning that grounds God’s saving work in Jesus’ resurrection rather than in Jesus’ death and dying. I will quote her here at length and encourage anyone to read the entire chapter. She writes:
Welcome Readers! Please subscribe to Social Jesus Here.
This is Part 3 of the series A Political Execution: Beyond Atoning Sacrifice
(Read this series from its beginning here.)
“The resurrection is God’s definitive victory over crucifying powers of evil. Ironically, the power that attempts to destroy Jesus on the cross is actually itself destroyed by the cross. The cross represents the power that denigrates human bodies, destroys life, and preys on the most vulnerable in society. As the cross is defeated, so too is that power. The impressive factor is how it is defeated. It is defeated by a life-giving rather than a life-negating force. God’s power, unlike human power, is not a “master race” kind of power. That is, it is not a power that diminishes the life of another so that others might live. God’s power respects the integrity of all human bodies and the sanctity of all life. This is a resurrecting power. Therefore, God’s power never expresses itself through the humiliation or denigration of another. It does not triumph over life. It conquers death by resurrecting life. The force of God is a death-negating, life-affirming force. This is significant in two ways. The black feminist literary artist and social critic Audre Lorde once said, “The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us to temporarily beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change.” What the crucifixion–resurrection event reveals is that God does not use the master’s tools. God does not fight death with death. God does not utilize the violence exhibited in the cross to defeat deadly violence itself. As Lorde suggests, while this may bring a temporary solution, it does not bring an end to the culture of death itself. Rather, one stays entrapped in that very culture. The culture of death is thus granted power over life. As such, “only the most narrow parameters of change are possible and allowable.” If indeed the power of life that God stands for is greater than the power of death, then this must be manifest in the way God triumphs over death-dealing powers. The freedom of God that is life requires a liberation from the very weapons utilized by a culture of death. In other words, these weapons cannot become divine weapons. This liberation was foreshadowed by Jesus’ refusal to cooperate with the powers of death at the time of his crucifixion. The culmination of this liberation is Jesus’ resurrection. Moreover, that God did not defeat the cross with weapons of death further illustrates the fact of God’s transcendent freedom. For again, it reveals that God is not constrained by the ways of the world to accomplish God’s ends.” (Kelly Brown Douglas, Stand Your Ground: Black Bodies and the Justice of God, p. 182-183)
Douglas explains that the cross was violent but that God’s triumph over that violent death was nonviolent. The resurrection is therefore a Divine, nonviolent triumph over violence and injustice. Douglas writes of these themes in the context of racial justice, but the same principles can be just as equally applied to all justice work whether it be economic justice, LGBTQ rights, gender equality, or any other kind.
Christianity is the only world religion where our central figure of belief and worship was executed by the unjust system of empire. The Jesus of our story understood where his actions of standing in solidarity with the marginalized and oppressed could lead. And he had the courage to stand in that solidarity anyway. As certain other religions of indigenous and marginalized populations do, the resurrection narrative also places Diety squarely on the side of the oppressed. This has deep ramifications for Christians who choose to engage in justice work today. When understood in the context of Empire, the cross calls us to rethink Jesus’ death as political execution. Juxtaposing the crucifixion and unjust power structures pulls back the veil and reveals Jesus’ death in its political context. It calls us as Jesus followers to insurrection ourselves, as we interpret the death of Jesus as political resistance. Jesus was executed by the state. Could the cross have been political execution rather than sacrifice? Reframing the crucifixion in its context shows it to be Rome’s political act, not God’s substitutionary plan. And in this light, the politics of Jesus’ death go far beyond heavenly bookkeeping. Revisiting Calvary as political execution leads us to a place where faith meets empire and we begin to understanding Jesus’ life and teachings as a call to participate in resistance to unjust systems that weaponize and wield death today.
Begin each day being inspired toward love, compassion, justice and action. Free.
Sign up at HERE.
Select your answer to see how you score.