Publié le Laisser un commentaire

High Limit Racing releases 2025 schedule; Season begins March 13 – The Union

Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to continue reading.
Please log in, or sign up for a new account to continue reading.
Thank you for reading! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Welcome! We hope that you enjoy our free content.
Thank you for reading! On your next view you will be asked to log in or create an account to continue reading.
Thank you for reading! On your next view you will be asked to log in to your subscriber account or create an account and subscribepurchase a subscription to continue reading.
Thank you for signing in! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Thank you for reading! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Thank you for reading! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Thank you for reading! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Thank you for reading! We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to continue reading.
Please purchase a subscription to continue reading.
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content.
Sorry, no promotional deals were found matching that code.
Promotional Rates were found for your code.
Sorry, an error occurred.

do not remove
Brad Sweet’s High Limit Racing, released their 2025 schedule. Season begins March 13.

Brad Sweet’s High Limit Racing, released their 2025 schedule. Season begins March 13.
High Limit Racing, owned by Grass Valley native Brad Sweet and Elk Grove native Kyle Larson, has unveiled its unique 2025 racing schedule. This one-of-a-kind schedule boasts 61 races at 36 different venues across 20 states, promising an exhilarating and diverse racing experience.
High Limit Racing starts on Thursday, March 13, at The Dirt Track at Las Vegas Motor Speedway in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Notably, the schedule includes three major events with six-figure paydays. These are the Joker’s Jackpot at Eldora Speedway in Rossburg, Ohio, on July 16-17, the 71st Gold Cup Race of Champions at Silver Dollar Speedway in Chico, California on August 21-23, and the Skagit Nationals at Skagit Speedway in Burlington, Washington on August 28-30. These high-stakes races are sure to draw a large and enthusiastic crowd.
According to highlimitracing.com, the All-In Championship Weekend, which serves as the grand finale of the High Rollers’ campaign, will be hosted at Fort Worth’s Texas Motor Speedway Dirt Track on Friday and Saturday, October 17-18. This thrilling event is not to be missed.
Other events include the Diamond Classic at Lucas Oil Speedway in Wheatland, Missouri, the Don Martin Memorial Silver Cup and Commonwealth Clash at Lernerville Speedway in Sarver, Pennsylvania, the Kentucky Sprint Nationals at Florence Speedway in Union, Kentucky, the 4-Crown Nationals at Eldora Speedway, and the Heartland of America Showdown at Lakeside Speedway in Kansas City, Kansas.
2025 High Limit Racing Schedule
Day, Date — Track Name — Location
Thursday, March 13 – The Dirt Track at Las Vegas Motor Speedway – Las Vegas, Nev.
Saturday, March 15 – The Dirt Track at Las Vegas Motor Speedway – Las Vegas, Nev.
Wednesday, March 19 – Thunderbowl Raceway – Tulare, Calif.
Friday, March 21 – Bakersfield Speedway – Bakersfield, Calif.
Saturday, March 22 – Perris Auto Speedway – Perris, Calif.
Friday, March 28 – Central Arizona Speedway – Casa Grande, Ariz.
Saturday, March 29 – Central Arizona Speedway – Casa Grande, Ariz.
Tuesday, April 1 – Vado Speedway Park – Vado, N.M.
Friday, April 4 – Route 66 Motor Speedway – Amarillo, Texas
Saturday, April 5 – Dodge City Raceway Park – Dodge City, Kan.
Thursday, May 1 – Texas Motor Speedway Dirt Track – Fort Worth, Texas
Saturday, May 3 – Texas Motor Speedway Dirt Track – Fort Worth, Texas
Friday, May 9 – Lakeside Speedway – Kansas City, Kan.
Saturday, May 10 – Tri-City Speedway – Granite City, Ill.
Friday, May 16 – Ransomville Speedway – Ransomville, N.Y.
Saturday, May 17 – Utica-Rome Speedway – Vernon, N.Y.
Friday, May 23 – Port Royal Speedway – Port Royal, Pa.
Saturday, May 24 – Port Royal Speedway – Port Royal, Pa.
Sunday, May 25 – Port Royal Speedway – Port Royal, Pa.
Friday, May 30 – Lawrenceburg Speedway – Lawrenceburg, Ind.
Saturday, May 31 – Butler Motor Speedway – Quincy, Mich.
Friday, June 27 – Lucas Oil Speedway – Wheatland, Mo.
Saturday, June 28 – Lucas Oil Speedway – Wheatland, Mo.
Friday, July 11 – Florence Speedway – Union, Ky.
Saturday, July 12 – Florence Speedway – Union, Ky.
Wednesday, July 16 – Eldora Speedway – Rossburg, Ohio
Thursday, July 17 – Eldora Speedway – Rossburg, Ohio
Thursday, August 14 – Thunderbowl Raceway – Tulare, Calif.
Friday, August 15 – TBD – California
Saturday, August 16 – Placerville Speedway – Placerville, Calif.
Thursday, August 21 – Silver Dollar Speedway – Chico, Calif.
Friday, August 22 – Silver Dollar Speedway – Chico, Calif.
Saturday, August 23 – Silver Dollar Speedway – Chico, Calif.
Monday, August 25 – Douglas County Dirtrack – Roseburg, Ore.
Thursday, August 28 – Skagit Speedway – Burlington, Wash.
Friday, August 29 – Skagit Speedway – Burlington, Wash.
Saturday, August 30 – Skagit Speedway – Burlington, Wash.
Thursday, September 4 – Port Royal Speedway – Port Royal, Pa.
Friday, September 5 – Port Royal Speedway – Port Royal, Pa.
Saturday, September 6 – Port Royal Speedway – Port Royal, Pa.
Friday, September 12 – Lernerville Speedway – Sarver, Pa.
Saturday, September 13 – Lernerville Speedway – Sarver, Pa.
Friday, September 19 – Eldora Speedway – Rossburg, Ohio
Saturday, September 20 – Eldora Speedway – Rossburg, Ohio
Saturday, September 27 – Bridgeport Motorsports Park — Swedesboro, N.J.
Sunday, September 28 – Path Valley Speedway Park — Spring Run, Pa.
Friday, October 10 – Lakeside Speedway – Kansas City, Kan.
Saturday, October 11 – Lakeside Speedway– Kansas City, Kan.
Wednesday, October 15 – Lucas Oil Speedway – Wheatland, M
Friday, October 17 – Texas Motor Speedway Dirt Track – Fort Worth, Texas
Saturday, October 18 – Texas Motor Speedway Dirt Track – Fort Worth, Texas
To contact Sports Reporter LaMarr Fields email lfields@theunion.com.

Your browser is out of date and potentially vulnerable to security risks.
We recommend switching to one of the following browsers:

source

Publié le Laisser un commentaire

Omar Lulu gets bail in rape case; prima facie consensual relationship, says Kerala HC – Onmanorama

Follow Whatsapp Channel

Onmanorama Staff
Published: December 20 , 2024 03:21 PM IST
1 minute Read
Link Copied
Kochi: The Kerala High Court on Friday granted bail to Malayalam movie director Omar Lulu in connection with a rape case. Justice P V Kunhikrishnan, in his ruling, noted that prima facie, the relationship between the director and the complainant appeared to be consensual. However, the court added that the investigating officer may continue the investigation into the matter, reported LiveLaw.
"I don’t want to make any observations about the merits of the case because an investigation is ongoing. But, prima facie I am of the opinion that it was a consensual relationship between the parties. But I make it clear that the investigating officer is free to investigate the matter and collect materials. But this is a fit case in which the petitioner is to be released on bail invoking the powers under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code," the Justice said.
Omar Lulu was booked under Section 376 of IPC based on the complaint given by the victim. He denied the allegations, saying that they were in a consensual relationship. The director presented proof of their stay in various hotels in and around Kochi. He showed that both of their ID cards were used to get a room in one of the hotels.
A young Malayalam actor lodged a sexual harassment complaint against Lulu, alleging that he raped her multiple times after promising her a role in a film. The statement was recorded by the Nedumbassery police. 
© Copyright 2024 Onmanorama. All rights reserved.

source

Publié le Laisser un commentaire

Cheap Altcoins Priced Under $1 Set For Major Breakouts In 2025: Kaspa, Stellar, Rollblock, Tron and Hedara | – Bitcoinist

Investors seeking affordable yet promising cryptocurrencies are turning their attention to five standout altcoins priced under $1, each poised for explosive growth in 2025. Kaspa, Stellar, Rollblock, TRON, and Hedera offer innovative solutions and strong use cases, making them top contenders for significant breakouts. These low-cost coins combine cutting-edge technology with high growth potential, attracting savvy traders eager to capitalize on the next crypto surge. Discover why these altcoins are worth adding to your portfolio.
Rollblock is emerging as a top investment opportunity for traders seeking up to 100x returns in early 2025. Combining the best features of centralized and decentralized gaming, Rollblock operates on its Ethereum-backed ecosystem, drawing significant investments from Bitcoin whales during Stage 9 of its presale. Analysts predict up to 880% returns for early investors before the token officially launches on the open market.
Traders are excited about Rollblock because it prioritizes trust and transparency. Unlike traditional iGaming platforms, Rollblock ensures secure and fair gameplay through Ethereum-backed encryption. Every transaction is recorded on the blockchain, ensuring users’ data is protected from third-party interference.
Rollblock also rewards its investors through a revenue-sharing model. Traders who provide liquidity can earn weekly passive income with staking rewards of up to 30% APY. This mechanism, combined with a buyback and burn system, is expected to cause a deflationary effect on the $RBLK token, increasing its value over time. Each week, a portion of Rollblock’s profits will repurchase $RBLK tokens, with 60% permanently destroyed and the remainder supporting the staking community.
Kaspa (KAS) continues to gain attention as a high-performance Layer-1 blockchain, using its innovative blockDAG architecture to enhance scalability and speed. Over the past month, Kaspa has risen by 2.8%, reaching a price of $0.15. The token shows strong momentum, backed by institutional interest and positive short-term chart indicators.
Analyst Alex Clay recently tweeted about a potential 5x breakout for Kaspa after 371 days of accumulation. The analyst outlined price targets for traders to watch for Kaspa, including $0.280430, $0.395145, and $0.511035. Chart analysis confirms this optimism with a healthy upward trendline that will probably offer support for Kaspa in the long term.
Stellar has seen a 30-day price increase of 140.98% because of the Bitcoin rally. Analysts believe this upward momentum isn’t over. EGRAG CRYPTO, a prominent analyst, notes that Stellar’s current price movement resembles its explosive rise in 2020 when it broke above its EMA and surged by 3,100%. EGRAG predicts that Stellar could rally by 360%, reaching $2.27 in the coming weeks.
Currently trading at $0.4524, Stellar has seen a 0.99% increase during the day. The altcoin’s trading volume has risen by 46.15%, indicating a potential shift in market control to buyers. With Stellar’s RSI remaining neutral, analysts think there’s still time to grow before Q4 ends as Bitcoin will continue to trade above $100k.
TRON’s price suffered a correction following a 100% rally last week. The surge occurred after the introduction of martial law in South Korea pushed investors away from centralized markets. As one of the largest decentralized exchange platforms, TRON became a primary choice for these investors.
However, the rally quickly reversed as the political situation in South Korea calmed. TRON dropped 35% this week and now shows less than 30% net growth from its previous rally. The altcoin has been losing value since reaching an all-time high of $0.42 in early December.
Despite this, TRON recently saw a 1,900% increase in DeFi transaction volume. The token’s trading volume remains strong, with billions of dollars traded daily. However, these positive metrics haven’t been enough to offset the weak price performance. TRON is now trading around $0.25 and further price corrections could cause a sell-off.
Hedera’s price soared in the last few weeks, bringing its market cap to over $10.8 billion. But the token is currently below its 50-day moving average. Hedera’s price has jumped more than 800% since November 2024 though the price needs more aggressive investor interest.
Despite its innovative technology and partnerships with major players like Google and IBM, Hedera struggles to maintain its gains. By 2025, experts project Hedera to be worth $0.63 to $0.76. However, for now, Hedera’s growth is slowed by weakening sentiment and short-term resistance.
Kaspa, Stellar, Tron and Hedera are all top altcoins. However, none of these altcoins possess as many unique offerings as Rollblock. Rollblock’s GameFi model and revenue-sharing model are set to attract holders of Kaspa, Stellar, Tron, and Hedera in 2025.
The presale price of $0.0415 is expected to rise rapidly, as experts predict a 50x rally due to a potential supply crunch. Rollblock has also strengthened its credibility by updating its gaming license with Gaming Anjouan, further solidifying its potential to disrupt the gaming industry.
Discover the exciting opportunities of the Rollblock (RBLK) presale today!
Website: https://presale.rollblock.io/
Socials: https://linktr.ee/rollblockcasino
 
Disclaimer: This is a paid release. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily represent those of Bitcoinist. Bitcoinist does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of information available in such content. Do your research and invest at your own risk.
For updates and exclusive offers enter your email.
Bitcoinist is the ultimate news and review site for the crypto currency community!
Bitcoin news portal providing breaking news, guides, price analysis about decentralized digital money & blockchain technology.
© 2023 Bitcoinist. All Rights Reserved.

source

Publié le Laisser un commentaire

Dogecoin Founder Says ‘WAGMI’ as Bitcoin, DOGE Prices Crash – U.Today

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Billy Markus, one of the two founders of the original meme cryptocurrency Dogecoin launched in 2013, has published a post where he commented on the massive price fall faced by Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin, along with the rest of the crypto market over the last 24 hours.
On social media Markus is widely known under the alias Shibetoshi Nakamoto. In this post, the popular ‘WAGMI’ acronym was mentioned, which is supposed to be bullish and optimistic.
Known for his playful, ironic and, frequently, sarcastic comments related to crypto market volatility, Markus responded in his typical manner. Publishing a post with a chart, where three top ten cryptocurrencies, including one created by him – Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin – Markus wrote in his X post in capitals: “SO GLAD I QUIT MY JOB.”
SO GLAD I QUIT MY JOB pic.twitter.com/5GDztFIJal
In that screenshot, Bitcoin dropped below the $98,000 level but in the past hour, the world’s flagship crypto has extended its crash by going down to $96,076 per coin. Overall, since Thursday, this constitutes a 6.45% decline from the $102,000 price mark.
Shibetoshi Nakamoto’s brainchild Dogecoin has crashed harder, falling by almost 17% from $0.36668 to $0.30491, where it is currently changing hands.
The second biggest cryptocurrency by market cap, Ethereum, has experienced an 11.2% crash, rapidly declining from $3,711 to $3,301 as of this writing.
The crypto market has faced stunning losses as $1.2 billion worth of crypto has been wiped out. Among those, the liquidations of long positions constituted the majority of the losses – $1.07 billion triggered by the speech of the Fed Reserve chairman Jerome Powell that the US central bank intends to drastically reduce interest rate cuts. The next coming easing is to be 25 basis points rather than 100 as was expected by crypto fans and the financial community in general.

Related

In the comment thread, an X user wrote a popular acronym WAGMI, which means “we’re all gonna make it” used for encouraging and adding optimism in troublesome periods of time not only concerning the crypto or traditional financial markets but events in the world and individual lives in general.
Shibetoshi Nakamoto reacted by posting an animated GIF to agree with that statement. But that response also seems rather ironic.
pic.twitter.com/X0d1zOIJWu
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are not investment advice; they are provided for informational purposes only. The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. Every investment and all trading involves risk, so you should always perform your own research prior to making decisions. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. We do not recommend investing money you cannot afford to lose.

source

Publié le Laisser un commentaire

Maternal mortality data is murky — but the crisis faced by new moms is clear – STAT

Complete your personal information for a more tailored experience
Home
Don't miss out
Subscribe to STAT+ today, for the best life sciences journalism in the industry
By Annalisa Merelli
Dec. 20, 2024
General Assignment Reporter
Too many new moms are dying in the U.S.
Exactly how many, however,  is harder to establish.

After years of neglect, the issue of maternal mortality is finally getting attention in policy and politics, as well as in the media, with headlines drawing attention to figures that show the maternal mortality rate has, at least according to some measurements, doubled in the past two decades.
advertisement
But some recent papers and media stories have questioned whether the crisis is more one of perception, raising concerns about whether overcounting and poor data have led to fear-mongering. An essay published in The Atlantic, criticizing the “doom and gloom” attitude about the state of maternal health in the U.S., argued: “Things aren’t getting worse for women; we’re just getting better at tracking what’s going on.”
It’s true that the data varies: Various sources estimate that the rate of maternal mortality per 100,000 live births in 2020 was 23.8 (per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Vital Statistics System); 24.9 (according to the CDC’s Prevention’s Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System); and 18.4 (according to the 38 states reporting to the CDC’s Maternal Mortality Review Committee). Some data sources classify deaths as maternal mortality only up to 42 days postpartum, while others categorize them as such up to a year after the person has given birth. Variations in death certificates over time make accurate historical comparisons impossible. And the absolute numbers of maternal deaths are small enough (typically under a thousand per year, and 861 in 2020) that even one or two miscategorized deaths make a difference. 
Yet even without definitive data, there are undeniable facts. Maternal mortality in the U.S. is several times higher than in comparable countries. Racial inequity plays a huge role in maternal health outcomes. And Black women in particular face three to four times the risk of dying of pregnancy-related causes than their white counterparts, irrespective of their income or educational status.
advertisement
The upshot: Improving maternal data collection and analysis is important. But experts who study the issue say that shouldn’t overshadow the fundamental work of understanding why maternal mortality deaths are happening and how they can be prevented.
“We can’t let ourselves get distracted by discrepancies around data and distract ourselves from how poorly we perform in the United States, and also the extent to which there are disparities across different, racial groups, payer groups, language groups,” said Amanda Williams, clinical innovation advisor at the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, an organization co-founded in 2005 by the state of California and Stanford University to improve maternal health. 
“By any standard, we really have a problem,” said Eugene Declerq, a professor of community health sciences at the Boston University School of Public Health and a leading maternal mortality data expert. “And you can’t solve it by ignoring it.”
While data is important, experts say, so is the qualitative side of maternal mortality — that is, not just whether or not a new mother died, but how, and why, and what led to such an outcome.
This side of the issue is perhaps best captured by the work of state maternal mortality review committees, which serve as medical and social investigation teams, taking every case reported as a potential maternal death in a state — even in very large states, deaths are rarely more than 100 per year — and studying whether it could be considered a maternal death, and if it could have been avoided.
The key question is whether the person would have died had she not gotten pregnant in the previous year.  “And trying to determine that in a death that happens five months after the baby was born is really, really challenging,” said Declercq, who sits on the Massachusetts review committee. “Then we also have to wrestle with, ‘was it preventable?’ And you often end up with this dilemma: it would be preventable if we had a functional social system that helped take care of her back when she was 17 and first started having a problem with drugs.”
advertisement
Such questions apply to many other potential causes of death. A woman who is killed by her domestic partner: Was her being pregnant, or a new mother, a factor? A new mother falls asleep at the wheel after work: Would parental leave have prevented her death? 
Understand how science, health policy, and medicine shape the world every day
Your data will be processed in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. You may opt out of receiving STAT communications at any time.
Maternal health advocates believe that one reason it took so long for these deaths to be acknowledged as a serious health issue is that maternal mortality sits at the intersection of many systemic ills: racism, economic inequality, poor access to health care, misogyny. 
Addressing maternal mortality “was never about one thing — it’s about a revolution,” said Joia Crear-Perry, the founder and president of the National Birth Equity Collaborative, one of the country’s leading maternal health advocacy and policy organizations. 
Focusing on data accuracy in order to argue that maternal mortality concerns have been overblown can even be understood as backlash to the movement focused on caring for mothers, according to Michelle Drew, a midwife, maternal health advocate, and the director of Ubuntu, a collective of health care and community workers serving Black families in Delaware.
Black women have been at the forefront of the movement to recognize and address the maternal mortality crisis, Drew points out, and the nature of the issue makes it inherently political. “Every [case] points back to some type of bias,” she said.
The history of maternity care in the U.S. is inextricably linked to white supremacy issues, Drew said. For instance, at the turn of the 20th century, white doctors used racist stereotypes to question the competence of Black midwives, with the intent of profiting from childbirth. 
Those who aren’t convinced that there is a crisis now wouldn’t be compelled by stronger data either, said Crear-Perry: “I don’t know what number is going to make [them] care about it.” 
There is no way to successfully improve the state of maternal health in the U.S. without embracing bigger reform, which is what ends up making the issue controversial, according to Crear-Perry and Declercq. 
advertisement
This is particularly evident when making international comparisons. “The difference in those other countries is very often that they have universal health insurance, they have paid leave, they have all these other things that make life more livable for a pregnant woman and her family,” said Declercq. “That’s right in the policymakers’ wheelhouse,  and then that’s uncomfortable because that’s real expenditures.” 
Some of the advocacy for better maternal health in the past few years has already delivered important policy progress, Williams noted. “Expansion of Medicaid, paid family leave, increased funding in maternal health, better funding for pregnancy mortality review committees — these are steps that are being taken that are meaningful moves in the right direction,” she said.  
An overfocus on quantifying maternal deaths also risks overshadowing another important issue: The much larger number of women who nearly die, or get severely ill, during and shortly after pregnancy. 
Data on this problem is even more elusive. Estimates suggest there are between 50 and 100 near misses for every maternal death, and about 60,000 cases annually of severe maternal morbidity cases — unexpected labor and delivery outcomes with serious short- or long-term consequences. 
Focusing on near misses offers better insight into what could be done differently, medically and beyond, to save mothers’ lives. A vast majority of maternal deaths, or more than 80% of cases, are preventable.
“I’ve been an OB-GYN for over 20 years, and I can count on one hand the number of maternal deaths that I have been even tangentially associated with,” said Williams. “But when it comes to severe maternal morbidity … that’s something that’s happening once or twice a month. It’s 1% to 2% of births.”
Conditions Williams sees in her patients include eclampsia, seizures, and sepsis, all of which could result in death if they occurred, say, in a hospital with fewer resources, or where the staff was less skilled. Every near miss, said Williams, offers an opportunity to understand how a death was prevented — and what goes wrong when the mother can’t be saved. 
advertisement
In many cases, “if the patient had someone to call, or knew the warning signs, or did not feel stigmatized about getting care for her drug treatment, or if she lived in a town that was closer to a major hospital, she would not have lost her life,” said Williams. “These are all things that are solvable if we have the political will to do so.”
Annalisa Merelli
General Assignment Reporter
Annalisa (Nalis) Merelli is a general assignment reporter at STAT. Her interests are ever-expanding, but she is especially drawn to the coverage of reproductive and maternal health, and their intersection with health equity.
Understand how science, health policy, and medicine shape the world every day
Your data will be processed in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. You may opt out of receiving STAT communications at any time.
By Megan Molteni
By Rafael Escandon and Arthur L. Caplan
advertisement
By Jonathan Wosen
By Ed Silverman
By Timmy Broderick
By Rachel Cohrs Zhang
By Casey Ross and Bob Herman
By Adam Feuerstein
By Jason Mast
By Adam Feuerstein
Share options
X
Bluesky
LinkedIn
Facebook
Doximity
Copy link
Reprints
Reporting from the frontiers of health and medicine
Company
Account
More

source