‘Nobody should be committing a hate crime in the name of religion,’ said Canadian Heritage and Official Languages Minister Marc Miller
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
OTTAWA — A Liberal cabinet minister pushed back on Tuesday against accusations that removing a provision that shields individuals from a hate speech conviction should they express a statement based on a religious belief amounts to an attack on religious freedom.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Marc Miller, a Montreal MP recently promoted to cabinet by Prime Minister Mark Carney, had served as chair of the parliamentary justice committee until his promotion.
The newly minted minister responsible for Canadian Heritage and Official Languages said as a person of Christian faith with “very, very deep beliefs,” he does not believe a religious text should be used, “to escape from committing a hate crime,” or make a claim that hate was being promoted “in the name of a religious text.”
Political Hack gets at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill. Wednesdays and Fridays.
“I think if you talk to people of faith and even religious leaders, they would see that this is really something that makes sense,” Miller said on his way into the Liberals’ weekly cabinet meeting.
“Nobody should be committing a hate crime in the name of religion.”
The parliamentary justice committee is where amendments are expected to come forward to remove the religious defence that exists for the offence of the “wilful promotion of hatred.” It would come through changes to a piece of government legislation, which the Liberals have struck a deal with the Bloc Québécois to pass.
As first reported by National Post, the Liberals and Bloc have teamed up to see them amend Bill C-9, known as the Combating Hate Act, by removing the religious defence exemption from the country’s hate speech laws and maintaining the rule that to lay a hate propaganda charge, a provincial attorney general must provide consent.
Critics have raised concerns about the bill in question for its proposals to create new intimidation and obstruction offences, which civil liberties and other advocates warn raise the risk of police action against lawful demonstrations because some may find protests to be disruptive or offensive.
Anthony Housefather, also a Liberal MP from Montreal who currently sits on the justice committee, called the legislation “an incredibly important bill,” which he says supports calls that have come from Jewish communities, who have been dealing with the police-reported rise in antisemitic violence.
Housefather, who cited his past public support for removing the religious opinion defence, said he supports the Bloc’s push to see it happen.
“This is saying that hate speech, which you’ve declared as a criminal offence, can be defended by good faith religious belief. I don’t believe that when you use hate speech, inciting someone to cause harm to another identifiable group, that should be saved by a good faith religious belief,” he told reporters on Tuesday.
The bill, as originally presented, did not contain any changes to the religious defence exemption to the country’s hate speech laws.
However, the Bloc Québécois has for years pushed for the religious defence contained in section 319 of the Criminal Code to be scrubbed, with its party leader, Yves-François Blanchet, who confirmed the deal in a statement on Monday, saying that speech which “incites hatred” is criminal, whether or not it is said under “the guise of religion.”
The section in question permits the propagation of hateful or antisemitic speech if the speaker expressed “in good faith” an opinion “based on a belief in a religious text.” The defence specifically applies to the offence of the “wilful promotion of hatred” and the promotion of antisemitism, which criminal law defines as “condoning, denying or downplaying the Holocaust.”
The Quebec party has pointed to the comments made by Montreal Imam Adil Charkaoui, who called for the extermination of “Zionist aggressors” during a public prayer back in 2023, as part of a demonstration related to the Israel-Hamas war.
Opposition Conservatives have vowed to fight the proposed changes to the religious beliefs defence, with party leader Pierre Poilievre calling it an “assault on freedom of expression and religion.”
Poilievre and other Conservative MPs slammed the proposal by circulating on social media a clipped section of remarks Miller made during the justice committee on the issue.
Miller on Tuesday accused Conservatives of “defending” individuals such as Charkaoui.
Charkaoui was never ultimately charged for his comments after an examination of evidence reviewed by Quebec prosecutors.
The Christian Legal Fellowship, a national association representing Christian lawyers and law students, has spoken out against the proposed removal of the religious defences provision, warning it could lead to a chilling effect on speech. Its executive director has also argued that those with minority opinions deserve protection from criminal liability.
Both the National Council of Canadian Muslims and the Canadian Muslim Public Affairs Council, two national advocacy groups, have also raised concerns about the changes, warning that it could lead to greater censorship and amount to an “attack” on places of worship and religious schools.
The Canadian Council of Imams also released a statement on Tuesday, saying it was “deeply concerned” about the provision’s proposed removal.
“It must be emphasized that the concern is not with criminalizing genuine hate speech,” it read. “Rather, it is with the risk that religious texts, which are not inherently hateful, could be misinterpreted according to evolving societal norms, leaving enforcement at the discretion of the Crown and law enforcement agencies, and thus creating a chilling effect on religious education, discourse and worship.”
Miller said on Tuesday, “I respectfully disagree.”
Justice Minister Sean Fraser’s office has previously said it would be “inappropriate to speculate” on any proposed changes to its bill, which is set to undergo clause-by-clause review.
The minister was not immediately available to speak to reporters on Tuesday. The justice committee is set to meet later that afternoon.
National Post, with files from Christopher Nardi
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
Beauty Buzz: The 3 best beauty products we tried this week from
From cheap flights and hotel stays to discounts on all-inclusive vacation packages and cruises
Splurge finds and stocking stuffers for the cooks and food lovers on your list
Home-grown gift ideas he’ll love from $29
Watch George Clooney take on the role of a movie star in ‘Jay Kelly,’ new seasons of fan-faves ‘Stranger Things,’ ‘Emily in Paris’ and a Taylor Swift docu-series
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2025 National Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
You can manage saved articles in your account.
and save up to 100 articles!
You can manage your saved articles in your account and clicking the X located at the bottom right of the article.